Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 47(8): 1997-2005, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1286382

ABSTRACT

The goal of this review was to systematize the evidence on pulmonary ultrasound (PU) use in diagnosis, monitorization or hospital discharge criteria for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Evidence on the use of PU for diagnosis and monitorization of or as hospital discharge criteria for COVID-19 patients confirmed to have COVID-19 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between December 1, 2019 and July 5, 2020 was compared with evidence obtained with thoracic radiography (TR), chest computed tomography (CT) and RT-PCR. The type of study, motives for use of PU, population, type of transducer and protocol, results of PU and quantitative or qualitative correlation with TR and/or chest CT and/or RT-PCR were evaluated. A total of 28 articles comprising 418 patients were involved. The average age was 50 y (standard deviation: 25.1 y), and there were 395 adults and 23 children. One hundred forty-three were women, 13 of whom were pregnant. The most frequent result was diffuse, coalescent and confluent B-lines. The plural line was irregular, interrupted or thickened. The presence of subpleural consolidation was noduliform, lobar or multilobar. There was good qualitative correlation between TR and chest CT and a quantitative correlation with chest CT of r = 0.65 (p < 0.001). Forty-four patients were evaluated only with PU. PU is a useful tool for diagnosis and monitorization and as criteria for hospital discharge for patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Chemotherapy ; 66(3): 53-57, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1219810

ABSTRACT

Following the discovery of COVID-19 disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, different studies have been carried out to recognize the stages of the disease and the methods of achieving correct diagnosis. Investigations of cases and their contacts have revealed different degrees in the symptomatology of the disease, with asymptomatic patients gaining relevance because of the controversy regarding their role in the spread of the disease. Recognition and assessment of asymptomatic patients is essential to carry out containment actions such as public health measures for affected patients and contacts. In this review, we assess the diagnostic aspects of asymptomatic patients according to the available evidence of people with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Virus Replication/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Humans , Kinetics , Pandemics/prevention & control , Time Factors
4.
An. Fac. Med. (Perú) ; 81(1):123-124, 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS (Americas) | ID: grc-745587
5.
An. Fac. Med. (Perú) ; 81(1):123-124, 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS (Americas) | ID: covidwho-1022989
6.
Rev. cuba. invest. bioméd ; 39(2):e760-e760, 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS (Americas) | ID: grc-741683
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL